Un PowerPoint exceptionnel, PJ / Inappropriées /
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:28:19 +0100
/
01NET
L'App Store censure
5 000 applications « sexuellement
inappropriées »
Apple a fait le ménage sur sa place de
marché. L'américain a retiré les programmes jugés trop sexy
après avoir reçu de nombreuses plaintes de la part
d'utilisateurs.
La
rédaction
01net
le 23/02/2010 à
12h40
Apple a changé en catimini sa politique concernant
les applications de son App Store. En quelques jours,
5 000 applications à caractère « sexuellement
inapproprié » ont été supprimées de sa place de
marché. Exit les bikinis et femmes dévêtues ! Tout aurait
pu se passer discrètement? si un développeur dont le programme a
subi les nouvelles foudres du constructeur n'avait pas contacté le
site américain
TechCrunch.
Les développeurs devront
modifier leurs applications
John Athernon, créateur de
Wobble iBoobs (que l'on peut traduire par « ballottement de
(i)seins », si quelqu'un a une meilleure traduction?)
- une application qui permet d'ajouter des effets de rebond à
n'importe quelle photographie? - a reçu d'Apple l'e-mail
suivant.
« L'App Store évolue
sans cesse et, dans cette optique, nous redéfinissons constamment
notre politique d'utilisation. Votre application Wobble iBoobs,
était non censurée auparavant car le contenu avait été jugé
acceptable pour être distribué. Cependant nous avons reçu de
nombreuses plaintes de la part de nos clients et avons changé nos
conditions d'utilisation. Nous avons décidé de retirer tout
contenu sexuellement trop explicite de l'App Store, ce qui inclut
votre application. Si vous croyez pouvoir effectuer les changements
nécessaires afin que Wobble iBoobs soit en règle, nous vous
encourageons à le faire et à nous soumettre à nouveau votre
application. »
Philip W. Schiller, responsable mondial du marketing produit
d'Apple a indiqué au New
York Times recevoir ces
dernières semaines « un nombre croissant d'applications
contenant du contenu très inapproprié. A tel point que nous
recevons des plaintes de femmes qui [les] trouvent trop dégradants,
de parents qui s'inquiètent de ce que leurs enfants pourraient
voir. »
Ce ménage de printemps pourrait
être lié à la sortie prochaine de l'iPad,
une tablette notamment destinée à un usage grand public et sur
laquelle il sera possible de télécharger toutes les applications
de l'App Store.
The New
App Store Rules: No Swimsuits, No Skin, And
No Innuendo
by Jason Kincaid on Feb 20,
2010
Over the last few
days we've been tracking Apple's recent decision to
remove all sexual
content from the
App Store. It's an alarming move on Apple's part, if only
because it shows that the company is willing to throw developers (and
their livelihoods) under the bus without any notice at all. Now
developers are left wondering: just what exactly is allowed on the App
Store? As it turns out, the new policy may be even more restrictive
than it first appeared.
Earlier this week, when Apple notified developers that their
applications were being removed, it said that it was removing
applications with "overtly sexual content". That sounds like the
ban only extends to apps that are little more than soft core porn. But
we're hearing from multiple developers that it actually means
anything that could be even the slightest bit titillating in any
way - including swimsuits and fitness outfits. In short,
if your app has skin, it will probably be rejected.
One developer, who wished to remain anonymous, spoke to multiple App
Store reviewers about the new policy. He was told, "there will be no
more applications that are for any purpose of excitement or
titillation". He was told this included swimsuits - both
bikinis and one-piece suits. Along with having dozens of his "sexy"
apps removed, Apple also removed one that featured a popular fitness
model in her workout clothes (the app was a marketing vehicle for the
athlete's line of protein powder). When he asked if the ban would
also affect apps like Sports Illustrated's swimsuit application, the
Apple employee wouldn't give a clear answer, but it was implied that
the SI app would probably be removed as well.

Developer Jon
Atherton, who is behind the popular application Wobble (which doesn't actually
include any sexual photos), also spoke to an Apple employee, and
posted this
list of rules to
his blog based on what he learned:
1. No images of
women in bikinis (Ice skating tights are not OK either)
2. No images of men in bikinis! (I didn't ask about Ice Skating
tights for men)
3. No skin (he seriously said this) (I asked if a Burqa was OK, and
the Apple guy got angry)
4. No silhouettes that indicate that Wobble can be used for wobbling
boobs (yes - I am serious, we have to remove the silhouette in this
pic)
5. No sexual connotations or innuendo: boobs, babes, booty, sex -
all banned
6. Nothing that can be sexually arousing!! (I doubt many people could
get aroused with the pic above but those puritanical guys at Apple
must get off on pretty mundane things to find Wobble "overtly
sexual!)
7. No apps will be approved that in any way imply sexual content (not
sure how Playboy is still in the store, but ?)
As far as we can
tell, Apple hasn't spelled out its new policies anywhere (our
request for more details has gone unanswered). Keep in mind that
these rules may not be set in stone - Apple is purposely vague about
its policies, and they're probably still changing.
These moves are pretty
ridiculous given the fact that the iPhone offers a full set of
parental controls - Apple should have just blocked the
applications from view of anyone who wasn't old enough to see them.
But the real issue with all this, as I outlined yesterday, is how callous Apple
is being with regard to the well-being of iPhone developers. It's
easy to paint anyone behind a "sexy" iPhone app as a scumbag, but
the fact of the matter is that a lot of young men have iPhones, and
they're willing to pay a few dollars for sexy photos - it's
business. There are magazine empires that are built around this very
principle.
The developer who I spoke to says that he's spent the last year
regularly speaking to Apple representatives, attempting to tweak his
"sexy" apps to accommodate Apple's constantly evolving standards.
He was told things like (paraphrased) "a woman can be pictured in a
bathing suit, but she can't have her thumb on the suit's strings"
- because that would have been too sexually suggestive. He'd
make the modifications and resubmit, oftentimes only to have another
photo get called out for an equally bizarre reason. During these
back-and-forths he was told that things would get better when the
iPhone's parental controls came out. And that was true for a little
while, until Apple changed its mind.
After making around
$30,000 last year from the App Store, he's essentially lost his
income. And Wobble's company, which was pulling in around $500
a day, is now making less than $10. Apple gave these developers
the green light to build "sexy" apps, and now that
they've built businesses around them, it's tossing them aside
without so much as an apology. To Apple, they're
expendable.
interesting pictures (a lot) e.g. 2007 + all necessary information
(2720) :
http://www.deliro.net
interesting litterature :
http://www.tba2.net/
interesting broadcast
(one) :
http://www.radiodeliro.net
interesting musics
(some) :
http://www.rolandmoreno.com
http://www.rolandmoreno.com/celimenes/celimenes.html
http://www.rolandmoreno.com/celimenes/cel01.html
Lien :
renee_She.pps